Empty Houses, Mystic Board, Psychics, tarot reading, free software, download, forum, Numerology, astrologer, daily horoscope, horoscope, Sun Signs, Zodiac, Divination, Chinese Zodiac, Zodiac, Reiki, Palmistry, Feng Shui, Vaastu Shastra, Runes, I

Posts: 421 · Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:19 pm

This was actually a question asked by LightofStar concerning empty houses. She asked what the significance was of having them.

There isn't any. Don't be surprised if you open up your chart for the first time and see that you have empty houses. I've never met anyone who has a planet occupying all of their houses. Planets in houses sort of augment what's going on with that house, like Neptune on the Descendant can show confusion as far as relationships with others go, something like that. However, the main 'feel' of the house is set by the house Lord: the planet who rules what Sign is on the cusp. So, don't worry if you have empty houses, each of your houses will have a Lord.

Posts: 62 · Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:53 am

what if a house have 3 sign in it ? also no problem ? and if a house have 3 sign will it make different in reading compare only have 1 sign ?

thanks

Posts: 421 · Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:05 pm

Like, an intercepted Sign in a house?

Intercepted Signs are a pretty prevelant occurance, it usually has to do with longitude and lattitude and it happens when you have a Sign that is completely within a house. I have Aries and Libra intercepted in the First and Seventh houses. My First house starts at 25° Pisces and ends at 4° Taurus. So, the last five degrees of Pisces, the entirety of Aries, and the first four degrees of Taurus are all within my first house. Regardless of the main Arian occupance, Pisces is on the cusp of my First house, and thus Jupiter still lords over this house.

Posts: 1905 · Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:42 pm

Dear Sei,

If say the 10th, 6th, 11 th and 3rd. house is not occupied by planets in a chart,as compared to another chart where the said houses are occupied. Would there be no difference in results at all.

I was under the impression that occupied houses mean that the native would have more action in the said areas and or would give more effort in the said areas.

Am I right ion thinking so?

Thank you,,

RishiRrahul

Posts: 421 · Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:14 am

Well, yes, that's about right.

The point of my answer to the question wasn't to downplay the importance of planetary house occupancy, but to undermine the supposed 'oddity' of having blank houses. It's not odd at all, happens all the time.

Sorry if I confused anyone.