Astrology of the "First Man on the Moon", Mystic Board, Psychics, tarot reading, free software, download, forum, Numerology, astrologer, daily horoscope, horoscope, Sun Signs, Zodiac, Divination, Chinese Zodiac, Zodiac, Reiki, Palmistry, Feng Shui, Vaastu Shastra, Runes, I

Posts: 672 · Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 2:42 pm

yeah I might agree with Vishwas

Posts: 2108 · Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:41 pm

If would have landed on the Moon we had have gone there almost every 3-6 times a year.And had a semibase there.

Posts: 6487 · Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:58 am

y do u feel Niel Armstrong wast the first? becoz of his chart or some other reason?

Posts: 6470 · Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:22 am

No, i think those americans guys @ that time, were a piece of shit, all they wanted to do was show off, that they were great geniuses over russia at that time.

But maybe later they would have gone.

But it is very costly going there, & also building a base there is useless, let those idiots use the cash to improve earth first, before going too the moon.

Posts: 2 · Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:54 am

I totally agreed that rather spending millions on building a base in the moon. The funds should be use to help our own human beings instead. There are so many people who are suffering from poverty and lack of foods. But sadly, those funds was not being use that way...