13th sign added, and signs are a-changing!?, Mysticism, reading, forums, Numerology, Sun Signs, Divination

Posts: 681 · Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:18 pm

I did hear there's a younger age pertaining to the change of signs ..
I mean it will not be "pertinent" to those with signs and birthyear now
before the change takes effect . Does this have much to do with the
younger people and students learning new sign of unlisted planet and
zodiacal reference and was it a reason of money .. as I am non-profit.

I will keep my sign if this newer fashion of uneven astrology will occur.

Will the powers that be astrology or money funding or otherwise want :
A Compromise About The Ruling of Teaching Uneven Astrology to The
Young Students of A Promoted New Age ., and Will It Be Sanctified ./.

Only wondering .. and not to be abstruse .. I don't support greed signs.

Evard .. ~ Cancerian ., very sure of it .. and happy with planetary now .

Posts: 148 · Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 3:20 am

Hey, you know how "they" said in some news article that the zodiac signs have all changed? I was just wondering, uhh, who exactly is "they"? Just a thought. I'm pretty much positive this is all just silliness.

The constellations aren't exactly the zodiacs anymore--I believe they were separated long ago. So technically the zodiacs don't shift, even though the constellations certainly do (but not overnight! The constellations have been off for ages)

Might be cool though for some hip new astrologers to come along and map out a new astrology. Imagine the possibilities! So much fun creation possible! Good idea. That's one of those "I would if I could" things I fantasize about doing. I'm sure you could come up with more than 13 zodiacs too! Just think how many stars are out there. How cool it would be to design and fashion brand new ones. I think someone uber genius could pull it off.

Posts: 26 · Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2011 5:53 pm

The Huffington Puffington Post reported this? Please. Those are the last people that I would be listening to regarding astrology. I don't subscribe to it, not in the least. Until I see credible information and supporting evidence then MAYBE I MIGHT CONSIDER IT but at this point? Not hardly. They should have released this information in the form of a comic strip - because that it what it amounts to.