[quote="jgenx"]very interesting...
Most everything was right on, except for the fact that the interpretations were for the opposite babies.  Now, being that they were born via c-section, Baby "B" should have been born first, which would have been right on with what you were saying.  Because of the complications, Baby "A" was born first, when she should have been second born.  Is it possible that your interpretations go along with how they were "supposed" to be born, rather than how they actually were born?  Thanks,
Jen[/quote]

Hi jgenx,

C-section certainly seems to introduces its wrinkles. At first I thought these were born through natural birthing process, and that is why I was questioning you about the birthtime (in natural births, there is usually five or more minutes between the two births and rarely as short as one minute).

The technique I was testing is based on some principles in jyotish (not vargas) and there are few options involved. Through this feedback as it gets tested against reality, I hope to learn to fine tune it better for such similar situations where vargas etc would not be very useful or practical. I will look into it and get back to you again. Hopefully you will continue to give me feedback. Just one question for now. Which of the babies bigger and continues to and did one of them have neonatal jaundice (could be mild and the yellowness may have lasted a bit longer in one than the other. Which one?

Thanks for your help

Rohiniranjan

Hi....Thanks for gettting back...
Baby A was born the bigger baby, and still continues to be bigger than her sister.  Neither baby was born with jaundice, but Angelina (A) was born with a hemangioma (commonly called a strawberry birthmark) on her face.  It grew to be pretty large in size, and we had it removed by a specialist when she was 9 months old.  When Isabella (B) was about three months old, she developed a small hemangioma in the same spot as her sister.  The doctors were pretty baffled by it.  There has not been a case where twins had this particular birthmark in the same spot before.  Because Isabellas hemangioma is what they called an "aborted" hemangioma, it never grew as big as the other, and she still has it in the same spot.  
Thanks,
Jen

[quote="jgenx"]Hi....Thanks for gettting back...
Baby A was born the bigger baby, and still continues to be bigger than her sister.  Neither baby was born with jaundice, but Angelina (A) was born with a hemangioma (commonly called a strawberry birthmark) on her face.  It grew to be pretty large in size, and we had it removed by a specialist when she was 9 months old.  When Isabella (B) was about three months old, she developed a small hemangioma in the same spot as her sister.  The doctors were pretty baffled by it.  There has not been a case where twins had this particular birthmark in the same spot before.  Because Isabellas hemangioma is what they called an "aborted" hemangioma, it never grew as big as the other, and she still has it in the same spot.  
Thanks,
Jen[/quote]

Jen,

You have no idea how much you are helping me and hopefully astrology with your sharing. Twins like these are very rare to come by and hopefully we do not try your patience too much in our single-minded pursuit.

I wish I could thank your two bundles of joy and you enough other than through words which may mean nothing in the reality we all live in.

Thank you, once again for sharing!

Rohiniranjan

No problem!  Thanks for listening!!  It seems that many people, (especially doctors) like to write some of these things off as coincidence, while I just want to gain some sort of understanding!  I think I wrote earlier on that the girls are "mirror" twins.  One is right handed, and the other is left handed...they are literally mirror images of each other.  There are studies out that are linking left handed people to having a "vanishing" twin...meaning that they were originally conceived as a twin, but their counterpart simply vanished.  It has been said that 15-20% of the population was conceived with a counterpart....
All of this deserves to be looked at...Thank you so much for your help...If you have any questions at all, let me know!  
Jen

[quote="jgenx"]No problem!  Thanks for listening!!  It seems that many people, (especially doctors) like to write some of these things off as coincidence, while I just want to gain some sort of understanding!  I think I wrote earlier on that the girls are "mirror" twins.  One is right handed, and the other is left handed...they are literally mirror images of each other.  There are studies out that are linking left handed people to having a "vanishing" twin...meaning that they were originally conceived as a twin, but their counterpart simply vanished.  It has been said that 15-20% of the population was conceived with a counterpart....
All of this deserves to be looked at...Thank you so much for your help...If you have any questions at all, let me know!  
Jen[/quote]

Dear Jen,

Regardless of what these *Doctors* of Medicine or Astrology (all kinds!) claim or profess to know, express or suppress, until such times when they really demonstrate that they can control and guarantee health, life and destiny, remaining humble and grateful must be our way...

And if human beings ever reach that point when they would be able to guarantee health, life and destiny -- my firm belief is that GRATITUDE will come naturally to us human beings :-)

rohiniranjan