I am so sorry for the confusion!  Thanks for helping to clear it up.  These girls have been challenging astrologers, doctors and everyone around them since they were born!  They are definitely going to leave their mark...
Thanks again,
Jen

[quote="jgenx"]I am so sorry for the confusion!  Thanks for helping to clear it up.  These girls have been challenging astrologers, doctors and everyone around them since they were born!  They are definitely going to leave their mark...
Thanks again,
Jen[/quote]

No need to feel sorry or apologize, dear!
Trust in God!
He/She KNOWS what we mortals (including astrologers, divinators, psychics and the rest of the circus!) are trying to figure out!

Why not get it straight from the source, the horse's mouth as the proverb goes?

RR

[quote="jgenx"]Hello!  I have a question that I am hoping someone can answer.  I have 2 and a half year old identical twin girls born under the sign of gemini.  They happen to be mirror twins...(one is left handed, the other right handed...their hair parts in opposite directions etc..)  They were also born in the same minute.  I am wondering how individual chart readings are possible for them given the fact that everything is exact...including their birth time.  They were born 6/9/05 at 2:41 pm.  Nobody has had an answer for me....Thank you!![/quote]

Hello Genx,

Thanks for sharing the data of your babies with us, and giving us such an intriguing and challenging example to work with. I am also thankful that you patiently responded to my umpteen questions and clarifications!

If indeed the two were born within seconds of each other, quite candidly the finer vargas even if they can theoretically work, it would be complicated since they change quite rapidly and one would need to patiently work out the exact match.

Does any of the following make sense or am I way out on limb?

Twins on MB:

First born: Possibly had slightly more health issues and needed

more care or attention during the birthing process. Perhaps had

the lower vitality score of the two (Apgar score). Took longer to

respond and had lower muscular tone in the beginning or even

generally. Will have a fine aesthetic sense and will be more

discriminating in tastes and preferences.

Though still very young, probably is the more sensitive child in

terms of being less explorative, tends to be cautious, responds to

stimuli excessively, possibly had difficulty in falling asleep.

Will have more vivid dreams and possibly nightmares.

Younger one: Physically stronger, less sensitive and likes a bit

of rough and tumble. Stronger appetite and may ultimately show

stronger physique and tendency or ability to detach. Will be more

independent and will tend to have a stronger temper. Will be more

accepting and less finicky.

I will now wait for your feedback.

RR

JGENX,

When you respond, please do not give details, just say if the interpretations were close to the observed with the two babies or not. And if the interpretations matched with the younger one but not the older one, just let me know. :-)

Thanks! This is so exciting! ;-)

RR

[quote="rohiniranjan"][quote="jgenx"]Hello!  I have a question that I am hoping someone can answer.  I have 2 and a half year old identical twin girls born under the sign of gemini.  They happen to be mirror twins...(one is left handed, the other right handed...their hair parts in opposite directions etc..)  They were also born in the same minute.  I am wondering how individual chart readings are possible for them given the fact that everything is exact...including their birth time.  They were born 6/9/05 at 2:41 pm.  Nobody has had an answer for me....Thank you!![/quote]

Hello Genx,

Thanks for sharing the data of your babies with us, and giving us such an intriguing and challenging example to work with. I am also thankful that you patiently responded to my umpteen questions and clarifications!

If indeed the two were born within seconds of each other, quite candidly the finer vargas even if they can theoretically work, it would be complicated since they change quite rapidly and one would need to patiently work out the exact match.

Does any of the following make sense or am I way out on limb?

Twins on MB:

First born: Possibly had slightly more health issues and needed

more care or attention during the birthing process. Perhaps had

the lower vitality score of the two (Apgar score). Took longer to

respond and had lower muscular tone in the beginning or even

generally. Will have a fine aesthetic sense and will be more

discriminating in tastes and preferences.

Though still very young, probably is the more sensitive child in

terms of being less explorative, tends to be cautious, responds to

stimuli excessively, possibly had difficulty in falling asleep.

Will have more vivid dreams and possibly nightmares.

Younger one: Physically stronger, less sensitive and likes a bit

of rough and tumble. Stronger appetite and may ultimately show

stronger physique and tendency or ability to detach. Will be more

independent and will tend to have a stronger temper. Will be more

accepting and less finicky.

I will now wait for your feedback.

RR[/quote]

very interesting...
Most everything was right on, except for the fact that the interpretations were for the opposite babies.  Now, being that they were born via c-section, Baby "B" should have been born first, which would have been right on with what you were saying.  Because of the complications, Baby "A" was born first, when she should have been second born.  Is it possible that your interpretations go along with how they were "supposed" to be born, rather than how they actually were born?  Thanks,
Jen