Govardhanvt ji,

What you stated seems to be the popular belief, but here is where I run into problem, Sir!

If we are not supposed to look into the charts of children under 12, how come it is that nearly every single classic produced on jyotish (hindu astrology, vedic astrology, whatever else jyotish has been called over the years) has a big section dealing with balarishta?

If we are not even supposed to look into the charts till they are 12, what is the point of all these combinations that are infanticidal?

Sorry if I am disrupting peace!

RR


[quote="govardhanvt"]Mysticdoubts.

Incidentally, Dr B V Raman suggest that prediction for child upto 12 years should not be done as it would tentaamount to Prediction of God.[/quote]

You are just INCORRIGIBLE!
Do take it as a compliment.
RishiRahul

Vyan99

Susie,
         Presently you are having Rahu in Moon from May 23rd. 2006. This period will give you confused and disorganized thinking and take you towards mental mirages.
         In fact you have never felt too all right from mid 2001 from when your home got disturbed, probably for a new life elsewhere.
          Around mid 2002, due to some impatient acts due to overconfidence which was not possible to be undone more problems catapulted, affecting professional happiness and personal too.
          Mid 2004 onwards you had to take some hard decisions and probably a minus of finances too.
          Oct 2005 helped you perform better professionally. Then we come to your present situation.
Are you in a creative profession like advertising or some technical line in the administration? A guess, but I could be wrong though.
          Since April 2007 onwards is your very present ordeal. Is the problem professional, out of the blue? If you could explain yourself with an item wise reply, with exlanations so that I could try to help you with practical remedies.

RishiRahul

Rishi ji,

Due to the nature of the forum thread structure, unless a fragment is quoted, the reader does not know which post is being responded to. I am assuming that you are in agreement with my pedestrian logic as to why I question the adage/dictum that some hold about not seeing a child's horoscope and yet the classics are full of combinations that not only talk about an infant or child's longevity, health but also of their parents' and relatives' as read from a child's chart. I think the pragmatic consideration is that during that period, more than the child, the parents are very vulnerable to suggestions. After all who wants to take a chance when their children are concerned. So the jyotishi must be compassionate, wise and tactful when discussing a child's chart, with his parent. I strongly feel, having seen some performances on the net and read a few accounts shared with me, that most jyotishis could use a dose of reality and a good strong practical course in how to guide others and in counselling.

I do not want to be a thorn and I do not want to bother the status quo, but we each have our karmic burden, I suppose!

RR


[quote="RishiRahul"]You are just INCORRIGIBLE!
Do take it as a compliment.
RishiRahul[/quote]

Sir,
I correct mself my including the fragment for transparency. I generally do it lately having learnt it from you, but after reading your perfect logic which had a touch of humour too( I mean the balarishta logic) I was too impatient to be practcal.
RishiRahul