In one category, we have the deeply entrenched opinions of rationalists and scientists. Their views are the easiest to predict as there has been no change in them during past 300 years.
These scientists and rationalists can be called the hard-liners obstructing the progress of astrology. Barring a few, they answer everything to do with astrology in stereotyped statements “Astrology has no scientific foundation for its tenets.” “ It is an ancient superstition that survives only in the minds of gullible people who lack any knowledge of scientific methods”. They denounce everything to do with astrology as fraud. Their assessment is an inherited one. It is a prejudiced one. It was perhaps shaped by revolutionary changes that the industrial revolution brought in mindsets. Religious considerations, snobbery, imperialism, were the other offshoots of these changes that influenced their attitude towards astrology and of course the bias against astrology, inherent in English thought also had a role to play.
Apart from this category of hard-liners, we have the second category of moderates who are agnostic-they judge astrology to be valid if predictions they are given come true. Equally, they turn critical when they come across a fraudulent astrologer or a wrong prediction.
A third category is of those with a blind faith in astrology, they are convinced that astrology always work. When the predictions go wrong it is either due to a wrong birth details provided or a casual analysis by the astrologer.
Read complete article on
http://www.journalofastrology.com/article.php?article_id=282