I am sorry if you all find that I overreacted in closing the other thread (Can I become an Astrologer)
There was nothing in the thread in itself that was the cause of action.
The only reason was when RR's opponent denied to give "proof" on what was found wrong in data programs, when he first claims that so was found, and his opponent could not see it.
When we discuss and gives a claim, then we must be prepared to give proof of our claim...we can't just say figure it out yourself.
By putting up the way he found the error, for all to see, all could accept his claim, or easy pointed out where his error was.
By asking his opponent to do the calculation, no error would be found, because he had done it 100's or 1000 times already and had not spotted it.
Since suspicion about the error was given, readers of the thread, with not good enough knowledge in the area ,would believe that this was the truth, so either way would RR and other Astrologer who use programs, be hurt from it.
I therefore found that it would not lead to any good discussions, for all to see, to let it go on.
Sorry to bring this into this topic, since I should have given this statement last night, but since the thread was mention in the opening statement I took the liberty
