[quote="basab"]Rohiniranjanji,
When you read about the predictions made by Brighu muni and Agasthya muni and how accurate they are then you start believing that destiny has to be predestined otherwise how could they have known so long back about our future.
Then astrology is a predictive science and if remedies can change destiny then how can one predict anything as everything can be changed by remedies or free will. This is my belief and it maybe that I am wrong.[/quote]
This is a common mistake/misuderstanding that many in the field have. What I said was that life is an interplay of bhagya and purushartha. We assume that those SAGES passively read some bhagya that was rigid. Like I said (and it is my thinking and not saying that this is the ultimate truth) the complex interplay of fate and free will manifests to different levels in different individuals. Many of the Super Sages (a few exist even amongst us) had the ability to introduce bhagya in the common man's otherwise bleak life through their SUPER free-will. Let us not pretend that what we can do or the clarity with which we can study other people's lives is anywhere near or at the same level or via the same mechanism which Bhrigu muni and Agasthya Rishi were capable of. I am perfectly comfortable in thinking that they were not reading but 'making' destinies! And who really knows what predictions they gave since I do not believe they left behind any diaries
If destiny were the only game in town, then astrology texts from ancient times, right from book-101 to whatever would not have given muhurtas and would not have dealt with remedial astrology. These two to me are evidence that even ancients believed that there is a role for free-will in our lives.
I hope it makes sense to you, Basab!