Predicting children, Mysticism, reading, forums, Numerology, Sun Signs, Divination

Posts: 238 · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:04 pm

Rishiji,
I remember our conversation regarding Arudha. I think this is a new concept for me and I certainly find it difficult to grasp sometimes.
I understand that for any signification, you see that from Lagna, Moon and Arudha of the bhava and upapada for marriage issues.

I think I now understand your statement of "future mode".

I guess this would be a great topic for our mystic academy class.

Rishiji, I understood what you meant by Rahu could increase progeny or deny it based on aspects.
But, in my example, Rahu is unaspected and placed in the 5th house with its dispositor Moon in the 6th house afflicted.
So, in such cases, it was my thinking that Rahu might deny children or atleast cause obstacles.

Would appreciate your view.

Regarding Jupiter and Saturn, I now follow what you said and totally agree with it.

Posts: 4815 · Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:39 pm

dhanyaiyer wrote:

Thanks a lot RishiRahulji

I am just a beginner and recently read an article on progeny calculation. Had some doubts and wanted to get it cleared. but that article mentioned that its the father's chart which gives a better prediction. it also said that if lagna is an odd house then counting is clockwise otherwise it has to be reverse clockwise for eg. 9th, 7th, 5th and so on. and also for ladies chart it should be counted from 9th rather than 5th. of course it said about taking into consideration the child house lord. planets in child house (5th, 7th etc), planets associated with the child house lord and lagna although it didnt mention 5th from moon.

I was trying to compare my own and my husbands chart for practice purpose. Hence my question about Rahu in 5th bec in my navamsa chart rahu is 5th from reverse as my navamsa asc is cancer and rahu in picses

i have another doubt...is saptamsa chart same to the navamsa or is it something different?

Also it would be great if you would you have some articles on the matter or if you could throw some more light on it as I felt these contradictions a bit confusing.

Thanks a lot
Dhanya

Dear RishiRahulji

This is the article that I went through. Could you please throw some further light on the same? There are also other jyotish related topics mentioned in there.

http://varahamihira.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2005-01-01T00%3A00%3A00%2B08%3A00&updated-max=2006-01-01T00%3A00%3A00%2B08%3A00&max-results=11

Please let me know in case of inability to open the link.

Thanks a lot
Dhanya

Dear RishiRahulji,

Could you also please clear my doubts about the counting system?

Thanks a lot
Dhanya[/quote]

Dhanyaji,

It took me much time to go through the link you mentioned.

The link contains facts contained from books of much older supposed astrologers/Rishis, and are a matter of research compiled in a blog. Within these the main contents seem to be the great 'Varamihira's' style of writing.

How much of it was diluted or whether it was written to act as a guide or for research has never been said.

Do not take it to be the 'be all and end all'.

There is no authentic and foolproof counting system known by me.

About the contradictions being confusing you are abs right. Always doubt whatever you feel as confusing "even if you find it silly"... and delve deep and deeper, question, experiment... be scientific.

Navamsa is called as Dharmamsa;Again Navamsa is the crux of the birth chart(base) which means that birth chart has its base as Dharma. Navamsa shows everything the birth chart signifies, but more in details and how the soul reacts to it. The soul reacts to the child born too. I am not going into the wife bit here.

Then there is the Saptamsa which has been designated to show the children thing in detail.

RishiRahul

Posts: 4815 · Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:51 pm

rajitha wrote:

Rishiji,
I remember our conversation regarding Arudha. I think this is a new concept for me and I certainly find it difficult to grasp sometimes.
I understand that for any signification, you see that from Lagna, Moon and Arudha of the bhava and upapada for marriage issues.

I think I now understand your statement of "future mode".

I guess this would be a great topic for our mystic academy class.

Rishiji, I understood what you meant by Rahu could increase progeny or deny it based on aspects.
But, in my example, Rahu is unaspected and placed in the 5th house with its dispositor Moon in the 6th house afflicted.
So, in such cases, it was my thinking that Rahu might deny children or atleast cause obstacles.

Would appreciate your view.

Regarding Jupiter and Saturn, I now follow what you said and totally agree with it.

Hi Rajitha,

Let us not discuss individual charts here; but Rahu unaspected does not confirm anything as(in terms of progeny) aspects help to confirm better.
Rahu;\'s prence can signify multiply children or even none.

RishiRahul

Posts: 49 · Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:00 pm

Dear RishiRahulji

Thanks for your explanations. I'm totally in alignment with your thoughts about the contradictions. I realise I just cannot take anything written as real or original or even 100% factual. Of course we will learn more while delving deeper into a subject.
Thanks for explaining the Navamsa bit to me. I've also read some stuffs on Navamsa and Saptamsa so am sort of getting clear on those definitions now.
I did download the software for divisional charts from mysticboard and it doesnt seem to mention the lagna in any of the charts.
I've pointed the error out and once it is rectified I can start reading about the divisional charts.

Regards
Dhanya