| crafalko81 wrote: |
| Oh great! I guess i've got a lot of stuff to learn! I knew it wasnt' going to be easy, but i'm thinking it's going to be years before I will get a full understanding of the combination of these cards. |
Teehee, exactly the answer of a princess of disks (student) and prince of disks (long term endurance) combined
I wish you much success. Many find it a difficult deck, because they adhere to Waite and see most other tarot decks as derivations of it. Crowley disagreed with Waite and even made him ridiculous on occasions. Even though they had to have a mutual background (kabbalah and esoteric - pagan - priesthood) to base their own ideas on, the resulting products differ significantly enough to make each of them unique. Personally I see them as being two brothers of the same parents (background), and for an outsider they might even appear to have similar features... they are recognizably coming from the same family. But the brothers don't get along, and only see their differences. For me, they have commonalities, but differences as well. And the present situation on the two decks is comparable to one brother - Waite - being popular and having a great many pupils. Everybody recognizes him on the street. His features became the standard. But the younger Crowley who is a genius too, always gets compared to Waite as a result of it.
The danger in that is that readers start to transfer Waite's meanings onto Crowley's, even when the cards are clearly different in tone. They do recognize some differences, but as they don't have a background knowledge to it, and have learned to fall back on Waite's imagery and symbology in the back of their head, it makes it hard to interprete what's different to it.
So, if you want to learn to work with Crowley it is actually better to learn to work with it somehow from the beginning. But the whole background to it and the lack of good books to it (and you cited the few good ones around) makes it a daunting task.
The Crowley deck has so much varioius symbology in it, that I advize you not to just rely on "Crowley dictionaries", but to acquire your own experience with it by picking 1 card a week at least, let it rest there, and note synchronicities with the images on the cards, the meanings you find in the books.
I think you have tried to start to do this, with your example of the 3 of the Empress. However, you made a mistake in seeing the 3 a bit too literally. Numbers have symbology too, especially in the major arcana. I advize Rachel Pollack's 78 degrees of wisdom to understand why I'm saying what I just said. And if you want some guidance in learning to use a tarot without falling back on Waite's school, then Mary Greer's Tarot for your self can be a great help as well.
Especially Crowley's deck asks you to let go of literal translations of imagery on the cards. Crowley's cards use the language of symbols like dreams do. Waite does too for that matter. Waite uses scenery and colour... Crowley uses loads of images for attributes.
So, it's great that you look at the card, note what's on it and try to give meaning to it. But it doesn't work that literally
Anyway, I hope that the interpretation for the cards of the reading you pulled were helpful in my first post to you. You don't sound sure of the meaning of position, that is why I tackled the cards on their personal/event/major theme level, rather than past/present/advice, etc... (You gave no feedback on my attempt to interprete them for you as you originally asked

)
