
I enjoy even these discussions about 'to do or not to do', we all seem so different...
I love to experiment, so I'm all for trying and, if it doesn't work, then go on to something else. However, I thought we were already into it, with the Aces, Twos, Threes discussions and their links to the Majors. I believe it is not so much about giving meanings that can be standardized, but what each card brings to mind immediately on its own, out of a reading context, like the Empress fertility and good natured abundance, or the Hermit's loneliness... I guess the interesting thing here would be to find out how each card makes a different impact on each reader, since PW will be looking for certain signs and links, I will be trying to 'feel' the image, Cedars will try to get the best possible meaning out of each (I'm just making this up, it's a hypothesis).
Of course, these meanings would probably not be fitting in a reading (or not all readings), but reading meanings are written everywhere, we don't need to give any more of those, really. I just want to play with the cards!
Um, let's see if I can express my idea more clearly: I believe what PW is proposing would help establish a closer intimacy with each card by making us think on it and its links to all the rest. For people reading these associations, it should help them to 'get to know' each card as if meeting a person. It's hard to remember names, ages, jobs and other boring data like that when meeting people unless you have a bit more juicy personal info as well. That is what I propose for the cards: just getting to know them better, so they will speak to us more easily when reading, and can give us the specific meanings needed in each spread.
I believe the more you feel the cards talking to you, the easier it is to give a reading. Of course, some have an advantage with their psychic input so that they begin to feel things before even looking at the cards. But for me it's a great help to have discussions on each. And there is no need to reach an 'acceptable' conclusion. We are just exchanging opinions, as far as I'm concerned.
Of course no one has to do it if they don't feel like it. I personally think we could use the info we are putting into the open thread's discussions, no need to do anything special. It all depends how you compile the info later and what you use it for: each will adapt it to their own uses, I suppose.
My two pennies worth
