Jesus-Mohammed-Bhudha
When God enters the soul and body of His most beloved devotee (son of God), such devotee is called as the human incarnation. In the human incarnation, we find both God and Son of God mixed with each other in a perfect homogeneous state so that both are inseparable like the wire and the current in the live wire. The wire is the Son of God and current is God. The live wire is the human incarnation. The live wire must be treated as the current and there is no alternative way to experience the existence of current.

In this context, the misunderstanding arises. The live wire says that it is moving the fan. In fact, the current is speaking this through the wire. People misunderstand that the bloody wire is boasting about itself as itself moving the fan. The live wire looks like any other wire as far as the properties of the wire (metallic nature, leanness, etc.,) are concerned. This makes other wires to think that the live wire is also an ordinary wire without current, which is boasting about itself. This confusion lead to the crucifixion of Jesus by the public.

When Jesus claimed that He is the truth, the light and the Father of the heaven, this claim was not from the Son of God, but it was from God Himself. But, the observers have misunderstood this statement as that of Jesus. When the speaker is invisible, the mike looks as if it is speaking by itself. Here, at any time the speaker is not converted into mike or the current is not converted into wire. The two units exist separately even during the time of the human incarnation in which, both are homogeneously mixed to form a single phase. If this point is realized, Jesus might have escaped the crucifixion. It is this point, which is stressed by Mohammed. He said that God would never become human being or the vice-versa. This does not mean that the Son of God should not be treated as God in the human incarnation by the devotees.

If you deny this assumption of treating the Son of God as God, the devotees become dissatisfied because they prayed God for the experience of God and service to God. Then the very purpose of the human incarnation is lost. Mohammed clarified this concept to avoid the danger. But, His followers misunderstood that He denied the very concept of human incarnation. Thus Buddha and Mohammed should be taken as the preachers who warned about the reality of the concept to avoid the danger of loosing the highest fruit and punishing the human incarnation respectively. The followers have extrapolated the preaching and as a result, Buddhists thought that God does not exist and Muslims thought that the human incarnation does not exist.

The concept of human incarnation is introduced and explained well by Krishna in the Gita and Jesus in the Bible. Krishna says that God enters the human being and Jesus says that God is in flesh. This clearly means that God is neither the human being nor the flesh at any time. Buddha and Mohammed clarified the misunderstandings of the human beings about this concept. Buddha indicated God as unimaginable through silence and Mohammed indicated God as invisible. The desire to become God comes generally, when God is seen by eyes in human form. Generally, the concept of human incarnation is avoided only to avoid the birth of this desire to become God. When God is invisible, generally the human tendency is to get some benefit from the invisible God and not to become God. But, Alas! The Advaitin has not left even the invisible God! He wants to become even that invisible God! Why becoming God? He claims that he is already God. For this, he proposed that God is the invisible awareness (soul), which exists in his body mixed with qualities, which is called as the individual soul (jeeva). He proposed that simple filtration of qualities from the soul will yield the absolute God because according to him God is pure awareness without qualities. The Advaitin gave his own false concept of God and also his own false way to become God.

now i will told you what  the meaning of "God would never become human being or the vice-versa".
that's mean,no human is the incarnation of the god,so none should be treated as a god..
i think you should learn english first then learn about the real theology...
stupid..



yup they are,but here,we just got dattaswami that just keep imagining all the time,without concerning about reality at all (or even to learn english well) and then he make his own theory that just beyond imagination (shortly,you can call it bullshit)..


Buddha never indicated anything about god..
it's not like Buddha just say a thing about god and keep silence.Buddha never said anything about god,even NEVER MENTION the word "god".
damn stupid imaginer...

You can also unprove that God comes in human form. There is historical figures like Jesus, Krishna, Bhudha etc who preached wonderful knowledge which no-one else can preach. They and their preaching stands as a proof of Lord coming in human form

wicked witch, whilst I don't agree with 99% of what dattaswami writes I think that telling him to learn English (which has a capital letter so perhaps you should take your own advice) is wrong.
Dattasami is Indian and as such speaks English as a second language - how are your other languages, you seem quite good at gibberish and slinging insults but there again you are only young, so I suppose you could claim that in your favour.

When you've finally mastered your own language perhaps you could move on to basic grammar,

(it's not like Buddha just say a thing about god and keep silence.Buddha never said anything about god,even NEVER MENTION the word "god").

A sentence always starts with a capital, and whilst I can work out what the sentence means, it does mean what you think it means.

So before criticising poor old dataswami make sure YOU can write correctly.

By the way these are called paragraphs, 1 idea is a sentence, a number of liked ideas is a paragraph, once those ideas have been expressed start a new a sentence.

I really do get upset when childish insults are thrown at people who are doing their best.

Safe.

Two thumbs up, professor.  Two thumbs up.