God is not at all bothered about the atheists or theists who criticize the misery

A person (God) cooked food containing sweet and hot dishes  (created world containing happiness and misery), served it on the plate (rules the world) and eats the entire food (destroyed the world). An ant (the human being) entered the plate (exists in the world) and tastes the food.  The ant criticizes the hot dish and likes the sweet dish for some time but gets bored with the sweet.  The ant can neither cook nor serve and nor eat the entire food.  If the ant enjoys both sweet and hot dishes, the ant resembles the person at least qualitatively in this one aspect of enjoyment.  Similarly, the individual soul can neither create nor rule and nor destroy this world.  

If the soul is able to enjoy both happiness and misery with equal attitude, at least in this aspect the soul can resemble God in a micro scale (Matbhavayopapadyate….. Gita). Otherwise, the soul does not resemble God in any way and if the soul says that it is God; it is the climax of foolishness.  The soul can attain God at least in this one aspect and such attainment is called as Yoga (Samatvam Yogauchyate..Gita). The human beings should understand that God creates this world for His own entertainment and this is not for the entertainment of any soul.  If some ants criticize that the person does not exist, the criticism of such ants is not even heard by the person.  Similarly, God is not at all bothered about the atheists or theists who criticize the misery.

stupid parable...

not bothering about the god at all,suffering and misery still exist for theists and atheists

Hey I agree with a witch - that's first.
The only difference between me and a believer is they blame god for their misfortune and threaten stop believing if it isn't put right, I usually start by blaming me for thinking out the course of action and the possible re-percussionsdeeply enough. Most of the bits that go wrong are down to human error not divine punishment.

wicked_witch;

God is not irresponsible He gives the results of the deeds of the souls to uplift the soul. He arrages the sequence of furits to maximum and optimum advantage so that the soul is benifited.

In addition He takes care of His devoties by cancelling their sins by taking the sins on His body, by coming in human form.

So, is He not kind?

Prof. Akers;

Lord is substratum of the whole creation and hence forms base. Without Him creation cannot sustain. Lord created the universe for entertainment. He has given free will to all the human beings to do whatever they like. But, the results will follow the deeds. So, He is indirectly controlling, that is to say that enjoyment for good deeds and misery for bad deeds. Misery is to bring realisation only and not to repeat the same bad deed. Otherwise, He is not responsible for one's deeds.
Creation is in Lord but Lord is not the creation. But such a Lord can enter creation at the request of devotees who wants Him only and His service. He comes down to give four fortunes to His devotees (to talk, to touch, co-living and to serve).