Mystic Board - Free Astrology, Tarot to Psychic  Discussion BoardWelcome to Mystic Board - Free Astrology, Tarot to Psychic Discussion Board. New visitors: Register Now its FAST!      Members, please Sign-In.
Log In  
 
Presenting to you the World's Largest Mystic Scripts Library
Click Here To Visit Mystic Scripts Online Library

Welcome to the MysticBoard.com

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
Click Here to Join MysticBoard.com

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please
contact us.




This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
Re: Finally made it to this thread
Wælwulf


Age: 34
Zodiac:
Leo



Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 32
Location: USA
Reply with quote
eliosduck wrote:
To dismiss the value of the anient Egpytion alhabet and it’s properties concerning relegious value for “Runes” only, does not make one an elitist pig, but rather a closed minded fundamentalist.

Academicly sourced enuff for ya?

I don't remember anyone disparaging "the anient Egpytion alhabet"[sic]. You should probably go back & read more of this thread. It looks like you completely misunderstood...

& yes, it's "Academicly sourced enuff" [sic], but your rant may carry more weight next time if you'll do a little proofreading before submitting a post. You misspelled academically, among other things.
EarlofLeicester


Age: 52
Zodiac:
Scorpio



Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 1455

Reply with quote
Waelwulf was stating that there were no historically verifiable Egyptian runesets, not that there was no merit in the Egyptian language.  Runes are, to the best of my knowledge, historically isolated to Germania.  Runes are more than an alphabet and language and that is the point he was making.  That the concept of engraving individual alphabet characters on certain media (such as wood or stone), associating the alphabetical character with a given meaning, having the media small enough that 20 or so can fit in your hands, and having precise and specific rules for casting and interpretation, well that is what the runes are, and that is why they are historically limited to the Germanics.  No one is accusing anyone of deliberate deception, but it is possible that the Eye of Horus was unintentionally and/or partially misrepresented as a runic construct.  Maybe we had a laugh or two about being a pig, but we care about our personal studies and, frankly, if we didn't care, we wouldn't be having this discussion.  

To Eliosduck, your sarcasm is not necessary.  

No one doubts that there were Egyptian glyphs, as you point out in your blog, and that they had mystical properties, like you point out. But, and it is a big but, the Egyptian mystical glyph is not a rune.  It is a mystical glyph.  They are not the same thing.
Rhutobello


Age: 68
Zodiac:
Virgo



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 10719

Reply with quote
We are many who have English as our second Language.
The fact that we are posting in any English "writing" forum show that we at least try to make an conversation in this Language.
I therefore find it out of order if any who have English as native language start to use writing error as  mean to downgrade any post.

When that is said, we who don't have English as our native language must be open for the fact that we can misunderstand many a post.
We must not attack....we must stay on case...and if we feel we are been done wrong by anyone...please contact a mod.

The same goes for an English speaking person, we, who try, have a limit number of words...so many times our statement comes out wrong...or with a meaning not intended.
Always try to read the post with an open mind...don't attack...try to clarify...if they are nasty...call a mod.

After reading this thread...I think you all have very good knowledge in Runes.....but I also think it might have come a bit out of hand.

Please stay on subject (runes)....not on each other
EarlofLeicester


Age: 52
Zodiac:
Scorpio



Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 1455

Reply with quote
Hi Rhuto, I sent a PM to MoonGoddess to address potential problems requiring moderator interaction.
Rhutobello


Age: 68
Zodiac:
Virgo



Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 10719

Reply with quote
The thread has developed into quarrel...where Rune knowledge aren't the main point....I close the thread.
Historical Precedent for the 3 Rune Cast
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All times are GMT  
Page 7 of 7  


 
 This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.  

Why Join mysticboard.com

Free registration. Friendly, fun, & open environment. Share, learn, & make friends all at the same time. Daily Horoscope. Your very own Personal Astrology blog.
For Experts / Professionals:
Professional exchange of ideas. Common ground to meet like minded experts. Bring about awareness & dispel myths. Share & Gain from experiences. Interact with amateurs & encourage them.
For General Members:
An opportunity to meet & talk to people from all walks of life. Make new friends. Exchange ideas, share your thoughts & debate over interesting issues. Have thought provoking Discussions with Experts & Amateurs. Create your own Personal Astrology Blog and share it with friends.
For Amateurs:
Be informed with the latest updates. Free exchange of ideas and information. Sharpen your skills by practice & expert guidance. Gain from expert advice. Interact with the Experts / Professionals.
For Skeptics:
Participate in a healthy debate; An open unbiased forum to voice your beliefs.

** REGISTER NOW **







RSS RSS 2.0 XML