This is an unanswerable question.

But there is a fairly good chance that if you had chosen a general reading this time, that it would not have been any different from the one which you were given.



That is not quite correct as it was one of those open yourself wide to any information which comes through you for this person reading, and was not specifically based upon your original question at all. It was instead based upon what my inner source felt was most important or urgent for you to know at this moment in time - which is a general reading whether you specifically asked for it or not.

But at the end of it I attempted to interpret the most likely meaning of these insights in the context of your question.

Evidently it appears that you and my inner guidance are in total agreement that you need some assistance in learning to deal more effectively and in a more balanced manner with the extra stress which this change in direction is forcing upon you, so accordingly in direct response to this, help was sent as needed.

Thanking you sincerely for your much appreciated compliments about the work I do on this forum, as well as your continuing support and friendship.

I have never put anybody on hold for one more month. I would like to if I may further clarify my position concerning this blanket guideline, which equally affects all of the members with no exception, who come looking for guidance and comfort on this forum.

It was decided by the owner of this site (and I fully agree with and will continue to agree with the owner's reasons for doing this) that a suitable minimum period between consecutive requests should be set at around 30 days (nominal one month).

The same guideline has applied on every spiritual/psychic website I have ever given my readings on, so this is hardly something unique or unusually unreasonable or heartless, specifically to Mystic Boards.

One of the main purposes of this policy is to prevent any person from becoming so overly dependent on readings to make their decisions for them, that they will not do anything until they get their next reading fix.

Also if one person asks for too many readings within a short period of time, this means that other members who have just as much right to have access to the readers will be locked out.

This situation hardly seems fair to me to the member who has not even had their reading yet, so accordingly everyone works within the same set of rules for the common good of this spiritual online community of like minded friends, even if people like your good self would never think of doing such a selfish thing and are in my opinion in no imminent danger of becoming overly dependent on psychic readings to make your decisions, instead of you making them as it should be.

Understood?

Cheers until next time,

EoT

dear EOT

first of all please accept my apologies for not conveying the message clearly as all i wanted to say was " since i asked you a question about a specific situation you came up with a specific answer because you believe (as per the guidance u recieve) that i should go through this situation before you telling me about the outcome to learn the lesson i have to learn and you are not supposed to tell me more about the same . had i asked you the question in another form you might have answered it differently" . that was it. i myself am of the opinion that one should not be all dependent on readings to base life's decisions and experiences thereafter.


i am greatful to have recieved your insights already over the matter concerned and couldnt thank you enough for the same in addition to what you have come up with in the past .

please be assured that i respect your decision to keep it the way you did in your post.

regards and best wishes to you

Sweet,  

There have obviously been misunderstandings by both of us concerning the intention behind our words, but that is only to be expected when we are attempting to communicate such complex and emotionally charged thoughts and feelings such as these via the highly imperfect medium of the internet.

I can assure you in return that that I have never considered you at any time to be disrespectful or discourteous, and you have certainly never been guilty of pushing your way to the head of the queue at the expense of other members, or flooding the board with multiple requests when you are not eligible to make one.

But your mention of the minimum one month between consecutive requests guideline did give me an excellent opportunity to make my point to those people who unlike yourself abuse the privileges of their membership and the voluntary services which we provide on this forum in the true spirit of helping and giving.

I value your friendship far too much to ever think any lesser of you as a person and a valued member, because of some trivial misunderstanding by either of us, that has temporarily got in the way of our effective two way communication.

In my book you will always be sweet by name and also sweet by nature, so please do not worry yourself any further about this and there is no need for you to apologise for the serious limitations of the English language as you really haven't ever done anything wrong in the first place.



TTYL,

EoT

thanks EOT for the positive feedback .