Thx for your question....because only by discussion we can point out each others view and problems we might see.
Our thought is not to interfere to much with the Readers ability to give Readings, when asked and if connection are in place.
That was the reason behind our change to take away any requirement.
back to your question.
As we can see almost each day, members goes from one reading request to another in hope for the ultimate "truth" or "solution."
What they many times get is more confusion...because each readers might connect to different parts of their situation.
This put an pressure upon the reader if he/she shall respond or not, and if not they might feel bad about it because they have no backdrop from the site to put it on.
But I can see your point....the way it now is stated is a "requirement", so I wonder if we use the wording "We recommend.........." will do the trick ?
This because it is hard to get all readers to behave united, and if there is no "direct rule", there will neither be option for frustration.
I don't think we can prevent any "seeker" to ask for multiple readings, so everything here goes on what you as reader feel most comfortable with.
Please all readers voice your opinion here in the thread..about other thing that need change or be included...as said before...."the rule" shall work as foundation for your work....so you yourself find it as a nice place to stay, but we need to have them simple..
It is always those who do the work that know where the shoe give pressure
