I think politcal correctness is just a way to make us all say and think the same way regardless of the country.  its not really going to work unless we all become green with blue stripes, godless, lawless and sexless.


I do believe that i should have the right to dislike individuals and i believe i have the right not to lie about my feelings. I also think i have the right to say that i dislike a person.  

I disagree that nations should dislike other nations purely on the basis of colour or religious background.  Better to dislike individuals for their actions

I do think that if you move to another country to live you should respect that countries beliefs, be able to speak their language and not impose your own set of beliefs on the neighbours regardless of what country you've moved to.

Its very difficult subject to broach, especially in a small country like my own where the immigrant population is set to out strip the indigenous population and where i will be looked upon as a curio and a relic of a bygone age.


Diversity is an emerging problem within my own culture.  I still do not understand why people choose to come to the country that i was born in to live and then change it to be like their own country.  If my country is not good enough to live in as it stands why live here?  

We already have a divided culture within christianity with the perenial problem of who's god is the best god, the green one or the blue one.  If the local people are having problems dealing with that, why allow other ethnic groups to come and add yet more gods/religious views into the melting pot when we haven't learned how to live with other people of the same colour yet.  We are probably horribly irresponsible by exposing other cultures to our way of life.  Its probably payback for what my ancestors did to the rest of the world.

[quote="suzisco"]I think politcal correctness is just a way to make us all say and think the same way regardless of the country.  its not really going to work unless we all become green with blue stripes, godless, lawless and sexless.


I do believe that i should have the right to dislike individuals and i believe i have the right not to lie about my feelings. I also think i have the right to say that i dislike a person.  

I disagree that nations should dislike other nations purely on the basis of colour or religious background.  Better to dislike individuals for their actions

I do think that if you move to another country to live you should respect that countries beliefs, be able to speak their language and not impose your own set of beliefs on the neighbours regardless of what country you've moved to.

Its very difficult subject to broach, especially in a small country like my own where the immigrant population is set to out strip the indigenous population and where i will be looked upon as a curio and a relic of a bygone age.


Diversity is an emerging problem within my own culture.  I still do not understand why people choose to come to the country that i was born in to live and then change it to be like their own country.  If my country is not good enough to live in as it stands why live here?  

We already have a divided culture within christianity with the perenial problem of who's god is the best god, the green one or the blue one.  If the local people are having problems dealing with that, why allow other ethnic groups to come and add yet more gods/religious views into the melting pot when we haven't learned how to live with other people of the same colour yet.  We are probably horribly irresponsible by exposing other cultures to our way of life.  Its probably payback for what my ancestors did to the rest of the world.[/quote)

THANK YOU!

I believe that political correctness is the biggest threat this nation faces today,” writes Beck, who sees it as a “coordinated effort to change Western culture as we know it” by restricting the language of public debate on many topics.

Beck’s remedy for political correctness is “to take back the First Amendment” by again allowing “every opinion to be spoken, no matter how ugly or unpopular it may be. That’s the essence of free speech.” (GLENN BECK QUOTE)

Does this "Freedom of Speech" proposed by Beck apply to all sections of the society, or is it just a ploy to attack muslims and the rest of the non-western world, under the pretext of political incorrectness?

Put simply, would it be ok for a muslim to call USA a rogue nation due to its actions in Iraq, in much the same way certain Americans exercise their freedom of speech to describe Iran as a rogue nation for whatever reason?

Hope you get my drift. This isn't an argument, but just a question to remind one and all that 'freedom of speech' and 'political incorrectness' could work both ways. Two can play this game.

I couldn't agree more! Eliminating this Political Correct stuff is not the answer to America as he thinks. The answer is the heart. We can dialog all day long and never be friends if one heart is hardened. We can exterminate 80% of the people with hardened hearts and guess what, our future generations will be dealing with the same kind BS we are going through now. There will always be kingdoms rising and kingdoms falling. There's nothing new under the sun. Thank you for your thoughts. Peace and Love.