I don't know dhurva but I am against censorship.  I choose to say away from the topic of death in readings and for the most part I prefer to stay away from health for a number of reasons.  I have more friends ask me about topics that correlate to the aforementioned topics than clients but it's hard for either of them.  The reason I choose to stay away from them is because even when I feel bad health my personal bias wants to look for the most positive outcome.  In the cases where there are no positive choices or paths to take, I just can't tell someone like that because if they are clueless about what's upcoming it almost feels like I am cursing them.  I'd never do such a thing, but it is my own personal guilt from doing such a thing.

I haven't read any of dhurva's post but he seems like a run-of-the-mill troll.  I could be wrong.  He simply could do a legitimate job and enjoy the shock factor part that can come with it. I can tell the guy has his own demons to deal with and takes way too much amusement in the strife and suffering of others.  I prefer not to read in public environments because it can either make the reader want to show off or make the reader shy and restricted or it can even lead the client to embarrassment.  Even if it's free I don't see a point to it other than practice or to build confidence.

The people saying he should lie or sugarcoat the truth are guilty of just as much as he is.  The way you see it he wants people to know the truth and feel hopeless about it.  The way people who sugarcoat without offering resolutions simply allow their friends and clients to be blindsided by the truth.

It's up to each client and each reader to make their own decision about this guy.  If you censor him then we might as well all start acting like book-burning, quick-to-lynch Catholics did during the reformation or like the narrow-eyed Protestants did during the witch hunts.

It is very sad that such a brilliant talent like Dhruva is getting abused and being discouraged.

I don't think life is a bed of roses. I also think when someone predicts death, it should NOT  be taken as definate death. In my opinion it should be taken as a really really bad phase with a chance of death.

And a warning such as what is given must be used to take every precaution to prevent any disaster.

Well i dont bother such things dude. . .
I know what i am , i know i am best just couple of ppl cant diminish , or discourage my palmistry knowledge. They will take ages to get close to my knowledge.
And one thing more i predict with confidence not just like" it can /may happen " i say it will happen ". . .
My confidence level is always great just simple palmists cant even challenge my knowledge. If they have guts to challenge come lets see how good you are than me

Have been on Holiday for the last 14 days, that is why I haven't interfered before now.

I will point dhruva7 to my earlier post, about the way he do predictions, and his reply that he should try to improve his way to post readings and answer.

I can see that his Ego still is greater then his Ability to evaluate what he says, AND THAT IN ITSELF COUNT AGAINST EVERYTHING HE PREDICT, because his EGO stand in the way for the evaluation.

I give the last warning, if you don't manage to smooth out your postings, then we don't need your services anymore, and we need to ask you to leave.

It might be a good thing for you after all, with your great experience in Palmistry, I am sure you must be able to get a Professorship in Palmistry, or you might use your time to write books, so other Palmist can take a share in your Great knowledge.

In order to avoid to much banging on this subject, I close this thread!