ty

ty

After reading anant29 request I wonder if he know that he is on a free site, where people helps out free of charge.

To educate one and one is very difficult, and when we see request for a lot of question with request to elabroate, then one wonder if not a class is more appropriate.

When someone then state that he/she find something easy to understand, then that is not an attack on anant29 but an statement that if you want to learn Palmistry by asking in a post, then you must have a easy grasp on thing.

I can't see anything inappropriate in  Parvin Kumar's  answer to you, but if you on the other hand was on a paid site, and had paid several 100 US dollars, then I could understand your frustration!

I didn't read anant's answer, but from the responses it appears he/she was not too friendly.

I do understand that there are people who want a quick answer and be on their way. But I do get a little tired of people specifically drawing attention to symbol A, marking B, feature C that they have already named with the correct label, and the correct mount and actually identify a specific marking actually worth questioning in the first place. So it appears they already know something about that marking, but wish to seek validation from people. What one answer will do to one person will suffice every other similar question. So if 10 people ask specifically about the marking under the index or under the ring finger as they've read it online/ in books, then it does seem a little odd that they need to query this further and still get the same answer. People want validation, and there's nothing wrong with this. However I do agree that reading a bit about this strange 'science', art, philosophy does a lot to gain insight. People have time on their hands, people don't. But if no desire to learn is felt, then it's not really respected. One marking is not the entire learning process. I soon grew to realise that lines were the least important features in palmistry and fingers, pads, length, shape condition, colour said a lot more about a person.

After reading repeated answers to go read chapters (which I might add is a time-consuming act, but NOT as time-consuming and generous as those forum admin who scanned, uploaded and typed out sections as a way of condensing acres of chapters) it is actually a very convenient place to look without trawling through inches and inches of internet literature. All that insight uploaded for free and in one convenient place from a book highly respected by professionals (Benham). That being said there are also archived posts (stretching to 2005) and the search facility which is how I learned.

So, I am also advocating reading about this area if you want to seek basic fundamental answers. It's a little more than predictive palmistry. Best wishes.