| ANKUR GOEL wrote: |
Dear friends
the most dangerous thing about palmistry or astrology is half knowledge...thats what defames this science and leads to superstitions ultimately leading to curse of this science...
plz plz i request my friends dont say anything if u dont have the complete knowledge of something as it can lead to some very bad effects...
"ISLAND in hand is never never a good sign !!! " and if someone has seen a good result in someones hand then it must be due to some other sign...coz handinterpretation is never because of one sign its just the resultant of diffrent signs and result is further got by how intense or weak they are in ones hand...
plz realise this that i dont want to do any personal attack on someone but just couldnt see any wrong information being circulated in this topic and people accepting that...so had to write this...
no hard feelings for anyone but please dont spread the wrong information until u are completely sure about it...
god bless u all...
thanku
ANKUR GOEL
( im a certified palmist from indian institute of astrologers,chandigarh chapter) |
Namaskaar Ankur ji,
Glad to have got a responce from you on this topic and hope in the future also you will be always correct us when ever we stray.
But let it be understood that neither Pravin ji nor me have any where stated that the sign of an island is a good sign to have.
Pravin ji quoted from my Gurudev's book (hence eliciting a responce from me) but I dont remember reading it from there (Let me clarify that i have not learnt Palmistry from my Gurudev and that he is my Diksha Guru only).
What i meant in the post was that the island sign is called Yava rekha in Indian system and is fortunate if well formed at the joint of the Thumb. Top yava rekha is seen for the fortune and Yava's on the lower joint is counted for Childrens.
Ifany one got the impression that island any where else is a fortunate sign to have then they have misread or i have being not able to clarify properly.
Hope thois post clarifies the issue from my side.
Thank you for your prompt reply.
vivek