Despite reporting this bug sometime ago, and the following post being put up on the 12th of October (it is now the 17th):
| swetha wrote: |
| the prb has been detected. will upload the new copy tonight. |
when I re-d/l'd the programme tonight, it was
still dating the year
AD 1956 in the readout as
AD 1920 (which has no information whatso, incidently), nor had the version (v1.25) changed.
Is it that repairing the programme is impossible or too difficult, or is it a problem with my complaining about having to use the year AD 1991 to get the results for AD 1956? Am I to shut-up and appreciate what I've got (the programme
was, after all,
free)---perhaps I am unreasonably expecting too much?