Thanks Vivekji,
| Quote: |
| The lord of a Bhaava always protects or promotes or tries to promote/protect it. |
The description of Vimshottari dasha results of 3rd ("..unfavourable effects in the Dasha of the Lord of Sahaj..)/11th lord ("...obstacles in gains of wealth and the possibility of diseases in the Dasha of the Lord of Labh..") in BPHS appears to indicate a bad period. Specially the description on 11th gives rise to a doubt whether the bhava is supported by its lord at all.
Though this lesson is not on timing/dasha, I thought of getting this clarified, since I think the above results are based on the tenet that 3/11 lords are malefic.
Also, will be grateful if you respond to my other question - Does a graha always promote its role as karaka? For e.g, Ve as a natural benefic always (assuming it is not otherwise afflicted) do good in respect of Marriage/sex/vehicles even when it is a functional malefic (Leo lagna)?
Similalrly does Sa always cause separation/delay/suffering (assuming there are no strong benefic influeneces on it) when it is functional benefic (Vrishabh/Tula lagna)?
CRS