WILD THINKING ABOUT THE UNIVERSE



PART ONE: THE UNIVERSE FORMULA



   Many people have tried to explain the universe. It seems to me that the Big Bang Theory is gaining its popularity. But I would like to ask: Where did the force come from which condensed all matters to a pinpoint ? The assumption of all matters being in a single atom, isn't it against science ?

   The Big Bang Theory is supported by the Theory of the Universe Expansion. However, the  finding is that, in a given space, no matter how far it is, matter content is about the same from one and another. Furthermore, I would like to point out that, if someone is on a plane, and he tries to position other planes, misconception happens easily. Galaxy expansion or shrinkage are non-stopping.

   Before I come up to my formula, I must persuade people to accept my view of the universe: The universe obeys a come-go-come model, it has no beginning and therefore it has no ending; it is boundless, always in equilibrium, in another word, saturation. Existing matters are always equal to dying matters and then equal to prematters, m=-m=pm.

    The deep puzzlement in understanding the universe is the source of gravity. My hypothesis is: Any object, when it comes to absolute zero, its gravity comes to zero. Gravity comes from the pushing force of the dying matter; Any object, its gravity is exactly equal to its pushing force when it dies.

   In the universe, dying matters give half of their pushing force to existing matters and the other half to prematters. The pushing force becomes the pulling force of the existing matters. The pushing force converts the prematters to the matters.

    Any object, its instant aggregate gravity is its instant pulling force minus its instant pushing force:
                        d(gravity)=d(pulling force)-d(pushing force)

Now, the challenge is how to quantify the pulling and pushing force ? I will put forth my assumptions later.

   I believe antimatters exist in the universe, they are photons and electrons. Photons are dying antimatters and electrons are living antimatters. Antimatters govern the universe, they determine when the atoms die and when the atoms form. Antimatters are always equal to matters, they reach the equilibrium through movements.

   There has been a debate about how photons travel. I believe photons are sent by the pushing force and they can not go straight even on Earth due to the presence of the gravitational field. A combination with a pushing field will add the complexity to how photons travel.

   I believe photons interact with electrons only. In this interaction, in an atom, electron's travel and self-rotation speeds vary, leading to the variation in electric and magnetic fields, a combination of which constitutes a gravitational field. Put it in formula:

  gravitational force=number of living electrons x travel speed x speed of self-rotation

   I think there are two causes for nucleus death: (1) it can not withstand electron gravity; (2) it can not withstand electron knocking.

   When a nucleus tries to join another nucleus, it must break the electron blocking of the targeted nucleus, so it absorbs the energy which will be released in nuclear friction. The number of electrons should be squared when calculating the pushing force:


               Pushing force=number of dying electrons(squared) x death speed (squared)


   When a nucleus is of light mass, electrons might not travel to light speed when the nucleus dies. In an electron acceleration, due to the increase of friction, the self-rotation tends to diminish.

   I do not know how the energy of a hydrogen bomb was calculated, but I believe the universe follows a simple rule: nuclear fusion, an accumulation of energy; nuclear friction, an energy release. I would like to mention that hydrogen atom death can also release energy. Besides, the explosion might have a chain reaction with the hydrogen atoms in the air also.

    The nuclear fusion theory basically comes from the analysis of Sun, I believe there could be a nuclear friction at the core of Sun.

   Suppose a high building fell, where did the force go ? It went to the impacted atoms. What made the building fall ? Gravity !

   With the accumulation of gravitational force, light elements inside Earth tend to die and heavy elements tend to increase, Earth is condensing by way of earthquaking. Considering the age of Earth, I am confident that every square inch of Earth has been shaken at least a million times ! Earthquake functions as a mixer, making all elements entangled together. All elements of Earth are dynamic, the tendency is the transfer of death fate from light elements to semi-heavy elements. Therefore, earthquakes will be more destructive. I strongly believe that quaking is universal.

   If I can conclude that the outburst of all elements is the result of gravitational force accumulation, and if I reverse this process, it seems not absurd to assume that all elements in the universe transformed from hydrogen !

   I am thinking that protons, neutrons and nucleus could be all positively charged and protons might not necessarily equal to electrons in number. Atoms themselves can also accumulate energy without crushing each other. It is possible that electrons take the photon energy and convey it to protons and some protons become neutrons(concentrated protons). The nucleus is also getting energy and constantly condensing.

PART TWO: GALAXIES

   Taking the universe as a whole, a galaxy is amazingly like an atom. Galaxy core---nucleus, stars---electrons, planets---protons, neutrons stars---neutrons.

   A galaxy's size and the life span largely depend on the mass of the core, whereas a death of a nearby galaxy can cause collapsing from the edge of the affected galaxy which could die earlier.

   It is confusing to call a galaxy core "black-hole", with the accumulation of gravitational force, it has evolved to the hardest giant piece of metal in the universe. Each single atom of that piece could hold well over a million electrons.

   If the core of a galaxy is invisible, it suggests that the galaxy is of a young age. As stars burning off their mass, they tend to contract to the center of the galaxy while planets deviating from stars. Probably this process makes the galaxy looking elliptical. The concentration heats up the core and it spins faster and releases greater gravitational force. In return, the surrounding stars orbit faster too. As a result, should inside stars have any planets which probably have evolved to neutron stars, those neutron stars would hit the core and be bounced back with fire. With gravity increase, the galaxy core will suck some stars along with their planets on the top of its surface, turning itself to a white core. Under intense heat and pressure, eventually one neutron star will hit and ignite the galaxy core, starting the death path of the galaxy. The huge shockwave will incur massive collisions across the galaxy and some outer star systems could be shaken off. Now, this galaxy is becoming a smoky, spiral one, and then a barred spiral, and then an irregular galaxy.

   In modern physics, I believe the mass of a galaxy core is overestimated greatly. The mass is huge, but it does not have to be very huge as if it were a mystery, it only needs to have enough mass to gravitate the first inner layer of star systems. It is the combined gravity of the center and  the first layer that binds the second layer. The law of physics always applies, it seems not applying when either the law is faulty, or human beings are faulty or both are faulty. An infinity comes only from an infinity.

   How does a new galaxy form ? When the galaxy core has been ignited, the massive energy will make the surrounding prematters to condense and spin and instantly become the master of stars which have just been shaken off. A galaxy death is happening with a nearby galaxy birth.

   I believe matters do not form in a death environment, supernovae could be the new release of the star's hidden energy, for instance, the star might have just sucked in a planet.


PART THREE: THE SOLAR SYSTEM


   Our Solar System could have come out of either a nearby inner star system of our galaxy, or a nearby spiral galaxy after being shaken off.

   The Solar System's single star structure suggests that it could be the outermost star system of our galaxy.

   Sun's ignition could be the result of either inside crushing, or the final hit by a planet. The rain of asteroids in our Solar System as well as the Asteroid Belt could be the direct results of Sun's ignition.

   If the distance between two stars in a binary is about the same with that of Jupiter and Sun, there is a possibility that Jupiter would someday shine like Sun, turning the Solar System to a binary. If this happens, probably Mars would be the finisher due to its mass and distance. In this scenario, most likely when Saturn is behind Jupiter to give a dual pulling, on one hand, the massive shockwave will push about half of Jupiter's ring and likely Earth into Sun; On the other hand, Saturn and all planets beyond, together with a portion of Jupiter's ring, would be
thrown out of the Solar System, fulfilling a phase of the galaxy expansion. The speed of expansion is: expansion distance minus contracting distance and divided by time.

   I have a feeling that Mercury could develop to a neutron star, becoming Sun's last bullet to kill the "king". Mercury has absorbed the most energy from Sun and it looks like a piece of metal already.


PART FOUR: EARTH


   I believe there was a chance that Earth had been hit by a giant comet which could have severed off the surface of the Pacific Ocean and that piece became Moon. This assumption firstly explains why Earth's surface is mostly water and wetter than Mars; secondly, had it been a terrestrial object of that size, Earth could have been broken into pieces.


   Many people know the "Ring of Fire", that is, earthquakes and volcano occur frequently on the perimeter of the Pacific Ocean, I believe this is due to the fact that Earth's energy often releases in scarred areas.

   Earth's regional gravity differential and the disparity in rotation speeds of Earth's surface and the atmosphere could be the causes for winds, clouds and hurricanes etc..

   Hurricane is a perfect example to explain the effect of gravity differential. Warm ocean currents pull air down, making the air to spin. Hurricane can not occur on land simply because there is no such a temperature differential on land.

   I believe Earth also expands and shrinks in response to a temperature change, leading to the formation of mountains and canyons, for example, the Grand Canyon.

   Earth could be losing water at an alarming rate, probably not all water comes back to Earth in forms of rain, snow or hail. Oxidation breaks water and sunlight might break up water molecule and those particles could reunite only when certain conditions are met.


References: <<Astronomy>>, a visual guide, Mark. A. Garlick

              <<Physics>>, Demystified

              <<Relativity>>, Albert Einstein