|
Subho
Age: 28 Zodiac: 
|
 |
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:51 pm |
|
 |

|
 |
 |
getting a point of view across is a very spontaneous process, if of course, you want to get across your real point of view. words and actions are enough to make a point clear. therefore, artificial points of views are never too late to be unmasked. and if the other end fails to understand it the way it is, he/she is not worth it. at least, I do it this way. misunderstandings happen. that's mostly because most people think in the way that put things in the convenient place for him/her.
|
|
|
|
Evard
Summoner,. Lord Druid,. US King Leader,. nPax
Age: 37 Zodiac: 
|
 |
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:01 pm |
|
 |

|
 |
 |
My Advanced Statement : When the future of what was not known in the past of :
my example learning to meditate .. was affected by a man who did not understand
Transcendental Meditation ., he wanted to push all thoughts out rather than easing
the mind and begin peace with mantra .. . I know today with meditation realize .,.
he was affected with a meditation forum who was not proper with relaxing mantra ,
they are a group who [foreign] did want to keep the smoking and historical stress :
about allowing the thoughts out by a book saying it was the history of steadfastness
which kept them from meditation proper relaxation . So I learn now what I did not
know before was the un~obvious reason he would not relax the mind with mantra...
What I mean is ::: when a conversation about who is right does not begin peaceful
understanding by what I see was not known to the instructed party with learning :.
peace or otherwise ., the other obviate effect was the party who did choose to now
disagree with the person who did not understand their reason and perspective. Aum
So when we choose to disagree we in fact begin compromise [understanding] with a power of mediation known as argument.
The argument [such as the ontological argument] may be peaceful ., though after it there with ways peaceful agreement . . .
will be more peace between those who did [debate] choose to disagree ., thereby the peaceful argument tended to peaceful
accord to begin a kind of solace known to religion as "solace salvation of peaceful disagreement" OK . !! Sellasie SaLah ,. aum.
Thanks with my non holistic broken phrases and former misunderstood logical way to report my thoughts.. Peace to you. Evard.
|
|
|