| mcclenning1 wrote: |
| There is some truth in what Rhutobello say's, although wrong when quoted as saying you don't need religion. Religion in its pure definition is a strong belief in a supernatural power or powers that control human destiny. To look outside my house to see all things that are not human made only reaffirms by belief in that supernatural being. You can call him anything you wish, a rose is a rose. If you can look to these things and convince anyone that there is no supreme being I will listen. Also, all things that are man-made were made from something that our supreme being made first, so when you think about it there is nothing that man made. He just rearranged it. |
I did a study on the etymology of "religion" and Webster's Collegiate Dictionary traces the word back to an old Latin word religio meaning "taboo, restraint." A deeper study discovers the word comes from the two words re and ligare. Re is a prefix meaning "return," and ligare means "to bind;"
So in other words (by my definition/deduction), "return to bondage."
IMO I believe in a God force (which to me is the spirit of life that exists in all living things, not a man with a beard sitting on a throne in the sky)
however i truly do not and never will believe in a need for religon. That is simply my opinion
I accept that everyone has thier own (different) understanding on the matter and however different each persons concept may be, each persons perception and input is valuable and valid and (so long as their belief causes no harm to the universe) They have the right to have it and be respected for it.
So i will listen to others beliefs and state my own if i see fit but i will also try not o impose my own beliefs on those who have a different perception from myself
