CORRECTION,

for a better view...

So....
The Sun is in Simha on 18. of June 1987.?

I have often thought that this dfference is because of the differnce in the place of origin of these sciences.. perhaps when Leo is visible in one part of the planet, in the opposite hemisphere, it is gemini? Is this right or have I got all wrong?

so, to add to my comment above, if this is indeed the case, both sciences are right - there is no mistake. Efer t othe one that applies to you in terms of where you were born...
A Rasi or a sun sign is the sign 'under which you are born' ..so where you are born matters...
That raises another interesting question... following up on the assumption that my 'guess' above is correct. If the western star signs originated in Eurpoe, how accurate is it for the Americans, the Australians and others in divergent parts of the planet? Perhaps the European occupation of different geographies at diferent times caused the popular spread of the western sign - birt period mapping.. people accepted the result, but forgot the rationale behind it?

Hello minaxie,

I am not sure about your first post,because I am also searching answer on that particular question.
It would be nice to open a subject on that topic and see what people think about that.
Do you use jaman kundali program?
Any software I use gives me something different when I select to make my natal chart.
Then I started to research more...

But for this software I do not know how it works.

For your second post,I fully agree with you minaxie,
The place of birth matters as the klimate where you are born.
I wrote something here...ot the end of the first page


IT is about what people forgot behind it...

Thanx for shearing ideas,

salut